16 April, 2024

Feminist concerns don't end with childlessness

My littlest niece turns 16 next week. 16!!! I’ve been more disturbed by that than my other nieces/nephews growing up. Maybe because I’ve had more to do with her. Maybe because she’s the last niece/nephew. There are already great-nephews on the scene; the oldest has his 21st birthday next week too. Good grief!

I was recently watching a teen drama, and couldn’t stop thinking about my niece being in each of the situations portrayed. Then yesterday morning, I read a NYT article that shocked me. I guess the fact I don’t have kids has protected me from the realities of teen life in the 2020s! Then again, because I don’t have the same bond and bias as a parent, maybe I can look at all these events and social patterns without quite so much personal involvement, and certainly without the fear of judgement of my parenting skills, or the often-delusional belief that “my child would never xxxx” that I have heard in the past from so many friends and family. I sent the article to my sister and chatted about it with her – she’s open to my comments as long as I’m restrained and tactful about my opinions! (It helps if I keep them generalised, rather than niece-specific!)

The thing about this article that disturbs me though is the lack of progress that women (or young girls) have made in terms of their sexual relationships. And men too, for that matter, as the article talks about peer pressure to perfect these acts. It stuns me that still, in 2024, certain acts are prioritised over female consent and pleasure, even by the young women themselves. And that what we might have seen as abuse is accepted by a majority today. Is it because they think it’s cool? That they have to, to be seen as desirable? That it fulfils some kind of female role? And some kind of male/female dominance/subservience role? Argh. Or is it just a lack of education, of discussion about gender and sexual roles? Is it just ignorance and peer pressure? In the meantime, in the practice discussed in the article, women are suffering ongoing health implications, and even death.

I don’t have to be a mother to be disappointed and disgusted by that. I don’t have to have a genetic stake in the next generation to be concerned about the future for young women and girls, and the way formerly abusive behaviours are being normalised. I despair that so little progress has been made. I could start into a much longer rant about my views on this, but I will spare you that. I'll just say that in this case, my bond with those who are subject to society's still biased gender assumptions and roles is far closer than any perceived distance between those who are parents and those who are not.

9 comments:

  1. Oh, I read that article too -- I was horrified! And I share your despair over the lack of progress (and outright regression, in some cases) in women's rights since we were teenagers. So discouraging. :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with the "outright regression, in some cases" in women's rights. So do my friends (also "old feminists"), and we rant about it regularly!

      Delete
  2. It's sad that some might (unconsciously?) think that being a mother is the qualifier for a phenomenon like this to matter. As another one with no genetic stake in the next generation, I, too, despair that girls/women are still so objectified to the extent that they (we) even to it to them(our)selves.

    ReplyDelete
  3. thank you for this NYT article/information. Neither sex nor love are supposed to hurt. May be that is a place to start a discussion .... but good glory things have changed in the last 60 years........

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh lord, I just read that article yesterday. The fact that the girls they spoke to were between 12-17 made me insanely sad. And I can say that middle school aged kids are definitely utilizing free porn as a sort of "sex ed," just like Peggy Orenstein said. The stuff they know about is horrifying, and then they think that's what sex and love are supposed to be. It makes me even madder at the Fifty Shades franchise, because while I read the series because I wanted to know what others were talking about, I also thought "wow is this a handbook for how to have an abusive relationship." It feels so disheartening that for all the advances of humanity, we just keep going backwards when it comes to women's autonomy, safety, and rights, and men's rights to not be pressured into doing that stuff. Ugh. Thanks for writing about it and bringing it to the forefront!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep! Handbook for an abusive relationship, and a poor example of a young woman justifying it all as being her choice, when it really wasn't. (And not just the sex, but everything else too!) And double yep - men's rights too.

      Delete
  5. Another "trend" from online porn. It is disturbing to consider what young adolescents and children are frequently exposed to. I have no solutions; I feel way out-gunned here as a parent/person. We talk A LOT with the girls about the consequences of viewing and posting anything online. My goal is no social media, no smartphones till 18. And I hope at that point they decide for themselves to stay away. I know this will be a harder sell as they get older. But I have seen literally NO good arguments to change my mind on this issue: the only reason for letting your kids go online or go on devices is "oh it's too hard to keep them from it" and "oh but peer pressure".

    Well we will see. For now, you might want to look up Freya India's writing: she is one of a few young people pushing back. Not sure she's addressed this particular issue, but many related ones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good luck for no smartphones till 18!!! lol It is so hard. But at least your girls have parents who are aware. I know others who seem oblivious. Thanks for the reference - I'll look up her writing.

      Delete